D SARTMENT OF THE. NAVT
4 FoR GORRECTION OF NAVAL BESORDMS
ROART
evils. COURTHOUSE poan SUITE 1007
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JSR
Nocket No: WR9934-14
n> Movember 2014
ai aye
Dear canta:
This is in reference to
naval record pursuant to the provisions of ti
United States code, section 1552.
your application for correction of your
tle 10 of the
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application oF 13 November 2014. your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
report of the Headquarters Marine Corps performance Evaluation
Review Board (PERB) , dated 20 August 29014, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence Of probable material
In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB.
accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
arror OF injustice.
request.
f your case are such
Tt is regretted that the circumstances ©
You are entitled to have
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
1 a
G
evidence within one year from the date of the Boara’&
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by
on.
ard
H-
Cus
e
h
to
QO
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9775 14
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has airected the requested change to the entry in section A, item 8.h of the report for 26 April to 30 June 2013. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9953 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all materia support thereof, your naval record and applicable s regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board h om) prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4259 14
‘ Tt is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the Memorandum for the Record associated with the contested fitness report by changing the corrected ending date in section A, item 3.b (*To”) from “90110917” to 690110907"; and adding the following corrections in section A: item 1.h (*BILMOS [Billet Military Occupational Specialty) ") from *0000" to “0699,” item 2.a ("MCC {Monitored Command Code)” ) from “SND” to “SP2," item 2.b (*RUC [Reporting Unit Code]*)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10592 14
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9423 14
| A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9785 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5677 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2716 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying For a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9357 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your — application on 15 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10599 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.